Unaided Recall Survey Shows Architects’ Brand Preferences

June 9, 2010

A completely unaided recall survey of architects’ preferences for specific commercial product brands has given manufacturers a first-ever, totally objective look at how their brands compare in the marketplace. Moreover, results from this survey—conducted by Accountability Information Management—have been compared to this same survey that was conducted three years previous, giving manufacturers an invaluable and indisputable resource for proving how well their brands have grown.

“Manufacturers have never before been able to state definitively that architects prefer their brand over others as part of a totally unaided recall survey,” states James Nowakowski, president of Accountability Information Management. “An unaided survey of brand preference carries a lot more weight and is much more accurate than a survey that lists possible answers, which skews the results. ”

Seeing results from both brand preference surveys side-by-side yields powerful information, adds Nowakowski. “When manufacturers compare results of both surveys, they have a critical benchmark for measuring the effectiveness of their marketing. Manufacturers can prove how architects’ brand preferences have changed over time.”

Using open-ended questions, the survey asked architects to provide the top three brands they specify or recommend. No brand names were provided. Respondents also indicated whether they were involved in specifying or selecting brands for particular subcategories within each overall product category. The study covered commercial product categories, including: Lighting, Security, Fire Protection, Plumbing, HVAC Systems and Control, Concrete/Metal, Doors, Windows, Floor Coverings, Wall Finishes, Ceiling Products, Roofing, and Siding/Masonry.

ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT INC., located in Palatine, Illinois, is a marketing research and marketing communications company with extensive knowledge in branding strategies and print advertising behavior through database management and technologies. Clients of Accountability include magazine publishers, associations, and public and private companies in manufacturing, construction and other industrial markets.

To access Accountability articles and white papers, visit www.a-i-m.com.

Visit Accountability at Booth 2859 at the AIA show this week in Miami and ask for a free sample of the Architects’ Brand Preference Survey.


B2B Magazines Should Stop Killing Lead Channels and Reinforce Inquiry Management, Says Media Analysis Expert

April 7, 2010

Sales leads from business-to-business (B2B) magazine advertising are dwindling. As leads fall off, and magazines seek other ways to prove their value, many publishers are making a critical error: eliminating the magazine-managed reader response channel.

“Publishers are abandoning ways for readers to inquire about advertised products and services through their magazines – partly to hide the fact that sales leads are decreasing, and partly to supposedly save money by pushing inquirers to the Internet,” says Jim Nowakowski, president of Accountability Information Management (AIM), a Palatine, Illinois, firm that specializes in analyzing and measuring B2B media strategies.

Magazine publishers have stuck themselves in a downward spiral: Publishers push readers to the Internet to learn more about the products advertised in their magazines, and in so doing, the Internet further reduces the number of leads generated by these ads. Moreover, in an effort to cut costs, many publishers have discontinued inquiry reader response postcards/forms that readers can return by mail or fax, thereby reducing  communications and the added information readers often provide about themselves.

“Publishers incorrectly assume that directing sales prospects to advertisers’ Web sites saves money,” says Nowakowski. “Eliminating the response channel is suicide for the publisher, because unless the advertiser has equipped himself to measure response, there is no way to tell where the inquiry originated. The reader response card is critical for verifying the quality of a magazine’s audience.”

Nowakowski recounts a publisher who hand-crafted his circulation to assure the high quality of his readership — and then the publisher discontinued his reader service card. His sales representative sold an ad schedule to one of AIM’s clients, and after six months, the client asked how many sales leads had been generated. “We had to report ‘none,’ because there was no way to know whether customers’ Web site visits or phone calls had resulted from reading the ad. Although the publisher convinced us of the quality of his readership, he could not demonstrate it, which jeopardized the remainder of the schedule,” he says.

To “save” the account, the publisher bound in a response card by the next ad for this client only. As a result, the client received more than 160 response cards, other advertisers demanded cards of their own, and the publisher ended up reinstating the reader service card for his magazine.

“This speaks to the need for keeping the channel open and having metrics to measure response,” says Nowakowski. Although he acknowledges that his client’s ad could have directed readers to a URL specific to that magazine or printed a special code that only those readers would be able to reference by phone, those are not sure-fire tactics: Inquirers often bypass these means, such as by omitting unique URL suffixes and heading straight to the home page instead.

“The reader response vehicle remains a highly effective strategy for servicing readers’ information needs while delivering key inquiry metrics for advertisers,” says Nowakowski. The Internet offers a way to effectively execute reader response, he adds, as long as publications maintain control of that response channel.

B2B trade publications, which are often geared to providing product and service information to professionals who spend more time in the field than at a desk, have not relied nearly as heavily on Internet usage as consumer publications with more tech-savvy readers. Yet B2B professionals, including contractors, building inspectors and maintenance managers, are increasingly tapping the Internet during the workday to download installation instructions, reference technical documents, and order parts and materials.

Like many magazines, Plumbing Engineer, a monthly magazine that reaches consulting, specifying and design engineers involved in the plumbing, piping and fire protection market segments, has been putting greater emphasis lately on working across both print and digital channels. The publisher recently launched a new site, PlumbingEngineer-Resource.com, on which advertisers can post their product literature free of charge as a value-added, lead-generating service. The magazine promotes this site to readers, who benefit by having a one-stop shop to request the product information they need.

“We are looking for opportunities to help our advertisers sell their products and services,” says Brad Burnside, publisher of Plumbing Engineer. “Advertisers continually seek the ‘value’ of advertising, and we have to tie in the circulation to that justification, and more. Some of that ‘more’ is this channel wherein the readers can respond to advertisers directly in one place.”

“The integration of print and Internet is ongoing and irresistible,” says Nowakowski. “Publishers have to embrace both channels.”


How to Make Manufacturer Incentive Programs Successful

October 27, 2009

Contractors and other industry professionals weigh factors such as price, reputation and availability when purchasing building products and supplies for commercial or residential jobs. When all things are relatively equal in the buyer’s mind, an incentive can swing a product purchase decision one way versus another. But buyers report that the incentives have to be worth their while and that obtaining—and keeping—their loyalty can be a tricky balance of offering enough value to tip the scales in their favor.

James Nowakowski, president of Accountability Information Management Inc., a Palatine, Ill., firm that develops and operates various types of incentive programs for manufacturers, says that many contractors find that the effort to enroll and qualify products for these programs is worth the trouble as long as the pay-off is substantial and realistic to attain. “Companies need to be committed to their customers on all levels and that includes customer incentive programs,” says Nowakowski. “It’s important to have strong customer relationships, and it all comes down to building loyalty and maintaining trust. Rewarding customers for their faithfulness is part of that relationship.”

The president of a Cincinnati-area commercial contracting firm with more than 100 employees recounts how he knew nothing about incentive programs until he placed a large order with a manufacturer’s representative several years ago. The salesman informed him that his purchase would qualify for thousands of points in the manufacturer’s loyalty rewards program, and the president discovered how quickly the points added up. “Once I saw the points collecting, I kept doing it,” he says. “It got to be part of a game.”

The contracting firm president says an incentive program itself isn’t enough to warrant purchasing from one manufacturer instead of another; good service and product quality are most important to him. But the incentive program is a “motivator” to specify that manufacturer’s products, as long as the prizes are worthwhile. Trading earned points for money or a catalog item, such as a laptop computer, sports tickets or a home entertainment system, is much more persuasive than promotional trinkets.

Nowakowski says what’s interesting is how participants who essentially “lock in” their loyalty to win these prizes usually have higher opinions of these manufacturers. Research conducted by Accountability has found that participants rate the manufacturer more favorably on factors such as customer service, dependability and product performance. “This loyalty translates into much greater value for the manufacturer over the long run than simply beating the competition on a single job bid,” he says.

ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT INC., located in Palatine, Illinois, is a marketing research and marketing communications company with extensive knowledge in branding strategies and print advertising behavior through database management and technologies. Clients of Accountability include magazine publishers, associations, and public and private companies in manufacturing, construction and other industrial markets.

For more information on designing and administering a market-specific program, please contact Sue Garrison, Interline Creative Group, 847-358-4848, sueg@interlinegroup.com.


Architects Look for Long-Term Value in Shower Enclosures

October 26, 2009

Third-party brand preference research finds that commercial architects are loyal to their favorite shower enclosure brands. Tried-and-true value is the main reason.

When Accountability Information Management Inc. asked commercial architects about their preferred brands for shower enclosures in 2005, and then repeated the survey three years later, little had changed. The top five preferred commercial brands from 2005 were also the top five brands in 2008, albeit in a different order. Although “status quo” would be fairly remarkable among a more trendy design crowd, architects are showing their more prudent side these days. And tried-and-true products that have provided good value for clients remain on their preferred list.

The 2008 Accountability Architects’ Brand Preference Study for Plumbing consisted of 13 sub-categories, including shower enclosures. Because the Accountability Brand Preference Study was an unaided blind brand-preference survey, it’s the most comprehensive research in charting the mind of the architect. For example, the research “counts” how many times architects ranked (unaided) manufacturers, their brands, as well as their involvement or lack of involvement; that is, the research has the potential for manufacturers to understand how architects perceive their products and brands, and for the first time, measure continually how those brand positions change without “helping”  them in their choices. This creates powerful information.

Architects wrote in more than 20 brands of shower enclosures, including Basco, American Standard, Kohler, Aqua Glass, Swanstone and Sterling.

Other findings from the survey:

  • A full two-thirds of the time, architects do not prefer actual brands of shower enclosures. Frequently, they delegate decisions to someone else, specify custom-made enclosures or base their brand decisions on materials they plan to use.
  • Survey respondents, who were asked to provide their #1, #2 and #3 preferred brand choices, wrote one brand nearly 30% of the time as a #2 choice. But that brand only captured 3% of the overall responses as a #1 brand, and it was never chosen as a #3 preference. Accountability’s conclusion: This brand is a solid second choice, which demonstrates good brand recognition and architect appeal, but the company needs to do some investigation as to why architects rarely prefer it as a first choice.
  • About 14% of respondents specified that their preferred choice for shower enclosures was custom fabricated product.

Architects experience an array of challenges when selecting brands in the overall Plumbing category. Following are some verbatim comments from architects:

  • “Convincing owners that the product is good.”
  • “Trying to keep clients happy with quality, cost-effective products and design.”
  • “Finding products that are modestly priced, meet code requirements, are environmentally beneficial, last (cost/life cycle), appeal to owner and architect.”
  • “Budget, sustainability, long-term low maintenance.”


For more information about this study or other research conducted by Accountability, contact Patty Fleider at 847-358-8558 or visit www.a-i-m.com.

© 2009 Accountability Information Management, Inc.


Boot Camp Stresses Overcoming Fear to Defeat Economic Conditions

October 19, 2009

EVER THINK ABOUT JOINING THE MARINES? GOOD. BECAUSE YOU’RE ALREADY IN.

An executive-level workshop held at the offices of Accountability Information Management, Inc. (AIM), a Palatine, Ill., marketing research company, stressed the need to overcome fear in this economic climate to “move forward” and keep business positive. The workshop included presentations by Lisa Clarkson, President of WFI Group, Inc. of Evanston, Ill.; Mike Paull, Labor and Employment Attorney with Klein, Dub and Holleb of Highland Park, Ill.; and Jim Nowakowski, President of AIM.

“It was intense,” said Nowakowski. “Lisa covered great tips for executives in dealing frankly with insurance costs and the uncertainty of what lies ahead, and Mike gave a thorough overview of the employment laws and how they are changing under the new administration.”

Correlating today’s business environment to the nine common elements encountered in a combat environment, Nowakowski shared how businesses can battle from a marketing point of view. “I read those nine elements to three of our clients before this workshop, and every one of them said, ‘That’s what I face every day!’”

According to the NAVMC 2767, “Users’ Guide to Marine Corps Leadership,” the nine elements of combat are:
• Violent, unnerving sights and sounds
• Casualties
• Confusion and lack of information (fog of war and friction)
• Feelings of isolation
• Communications breakdown
• Individual discomfort and physical fatigue
• Fear, stress and mental fatigue
• Continuous operations
• Homesickness

“You can relate any one of those to your day-to-day,” Nowakowski said. “Ask any person today if that’s what they are feeling. If they tell you it’s not like that, then you are being told a tall tale. Of course,” he added smiling, “even though we’re in extremely difficult times, as one of our clients put it, ‘It’s still not as tough as sitting in a helicopter and getting shot at from the enemy below.’ It’s all in your point of view. The key is to overcome fear and move forward.”

For more information on the workshop, contact: Sue Garrison, Interline Creative Group, at phone: 847-358-4848 or e-mail: sueg@interlinegroup.com.


Ad Agency Learns Eating Right is Creative Too

October 7, 2009

The ad agency business isn’t just about creativity. Eating right can be creative – and productive. At least that’s what Jim Nowakowski, president of Interline Creative Group, an advertising and marketing research company located outside Chicago, learned at its recent Wellness Day held for its 24 employees.

“We know that active, healthy people tend to be more positive about life and work,” said Nowakowski. “To expand our positive working environment based on service and knowledge, we held a Wellness Day in September, which included sessions on Diet and Nutrition.”

Employees experienced first-hand how to prepare meals for a healthier lifestyle from Julie Fulton, RD, LDN, NSCA-CPT, of Mint Condition Wellness & Training Center, Oak Brook, Ill. “It was like watching someone on the Food Channel,” said Nowakowski. “It was great.”

Fulton gave useful shortcuts in preparing healthy meals and presented alternative creations to favorite standards, including chili, pizza and even salad. “Making wellness day every day can be done simply by changing the way you think about food. Having protein as a side rather than the main dish can greatly change the way our bodies react to our food choices,” stated Fulton.

“Healthier employees perform better, innovate better, and work better as a team. This was an opportunity for all of us to break some stress from today’s economic climate and learn about eating right,” said Nowakowski. “Wellness leads to satisfaction; and satisfaction easily transfers to increased morale, reduced employee stress, and more engaged and healthier employees. This ultimately has a positive impact on productivity, absenteeism and profits.”

For more information, contact: Interline Creative Group, Inc., 553 N. North Court, Suite 160, Palatine, IL 60067. Phone: 847.358.4848. Web site: www.interlinegroup.com.


Control Marketing Costs, Increase Effectiveness with RFM Approach to Databases

September 22, 2009

B2B companies should borrow a page from catalog sales companies that use the tried-and-true approach of determining Recency, Frequency and Monetary values to gauge the effectiveness of marketing.

By Jim Nowakowski, President, Accountability Information Management, Inc.

A database is a collection of organized information; it’s a list. Many companies have such databases, but they are difficult to access. Databases that are effectively maintained are assets to companies and organizations that can use them to monitor data for marketing purposes, including tracking potential customers. Data can be especially useful when trying to determine Recency, Frequency and Monetary values for marketing analysis.

Customer data is vital to a B2B company’s marketing tactics. However, it’s only really helpful if the data is “clean” ─ it undergoes regular maintenance to help you minimize the risk of marketing to unprofitable prospects. Good list hygiene starts with defining your databases, both current customers and prospects. A common mistake is for marketers to group these two types together. However, they should be treated differently for optimal results.

Once databases are properly defined, you should concentrate on establishing targets within each database. This is done by sorting them by specific criteria that will show you what you need to know for more effective marketing purposes.

If you do not know where your databases are, you must find them and download them into a Microsoft Excel file. Then you must maintain control of them and keep them somewhere where only you or your designees can access and manage the information.

RFM:  The key to analysis

RFM stands for Recency, Frequency, and Monetary values, which are elements in customer purchase behavior that predict whether a person will respond to a promotion. Many methods exist for calculating RFM, but sorting in Excel is among the best tools for producing a comprehensive picture. For Recency, your customer file is sorted by the most recent purchase contact with a customer. This assumes that the “purchase date” is a field in your database. As a matter of fact, the following fields would be required and preferred for your customer file:

  • # of Transactions
  • Amount of Transaction
  • Item Purchased
  • Date Purchased
  • Profile the Company (demographics)
  • Name, Address, City, State, ZIP, Phone, e-mail, fax

For your Recency analysis, sort from “Most Recent” to “Least Recent” on the purchase date field. Then, divide your sorted list into five equal parts (20%), known as quintiles. Assign the top 20% a value of “5,” the next 20% “4” and so on. If you were to do a promotion to your entire file, the best response would emerge from your “5s” because they are the most recent. People who have bought from you recently are more likely to respond to an offer than someone who had made a purchase in the past.

Frequency analysis is done the same way, but sorted on the number of times a customer has purchased from you. Finally, do the same with Monetary values. You will now have all of your customers with three new values: quintile scores in RFM, which can be added up into a total value, and then sorted from highest to lowest, giving you a profile of your best to worst customers. This is extremely valuable information in understanding the lifetime value of a customer, as well as behavior patterns to structure a strategy of contact.

Advance preparation completed before you build your customer file is the most important work you will do. You cannot underestimate the importance of planning the database. The cleanliness and standardization of data in advance will only help you make more informed judgment calls based on insights from what the data says.

The RFM approach can help you improve your marketing efforts by targeting the best potential customers for what you have to offer. The key to understanding your customers is having one collective standardized database that’s continually updated. Every time you touch your data, you’re evaluating your business relationships and your market, and you’ll gain a new perspective that can lead to additional strategies. Business is always changing, and this approach ultimately gives you real-time knowledge to target the right customers and increase your marketing effectiveness while keeping costs under control.

For more information, contact Jim Nowakowski at (847) 358-8558 or visit Accountability Information Management, Inc. at www.a-i-m.com.


What Does Your Audience Want to Read?

September 14, 2009

When it comes to literature that promotes your products and services, it pays to know what you’re doing. Literally. By knowing what approach to take in marketing your company through literature, you can dramatically increase its effectiveness and its cost/profit ratio. This is of immense importance, especially if you are working with a limited budget.

The first thing to consider, of course, is your audience. Are you reaching consultants who want to use brochures to show their own customers, or are they specifiers who need more technical information? Likely, you have a combination of literature requirements, based in part on the people, as well as where these customers and prospects are in the sales cycle. Marketing materials should speak directly to your target groups.

Next, decide on the overall layout of your material. Is it better suited to a flier or a brochure? Should it be lengthy, or does it lend itself to a short full-page photo ad? Decide this before pen ever hits paper, or you may go well over your budget.

Now, you’re ready to consider the format of the idea. Do you want to promote your idea with more pictures or words? Also consider whether you want a big, eye-catching headline that helps further sell customers on your products, or a more educational message that gives detailed information on your products and how they work.

Finally, analyze whether the above three outcomes mesh together. If one of these items doesn’t seem to fit, change things accordingly. You may have to revisit this process several times to get the right collage of ideas. Once you do, you will know. It will speak to you the way you envisioned it in your head.


What’s Your Hot Button?

August 25, 2009

By Jim Nowakowski, President
Accountability Information Management, Inc.

Part of what Accountability Information Management does is research the electrical distribution marketplace. Manufacturers want to know what distributors think, and distributors want to know what manufacturers think.

In a recent Brand Preference survey conducted for T.E.D. Magazine (a B2B magazine for electrical distributors), we asked distributors to rank factors in terms of the importance of each factor relative to particular products or services. Here’s what we found.

Delivery and Availability of a product or service are perceived as “very important,” according to distributors. Customer Service was third in ranking as “very important.” But then the percentages of people who checked these categories as “very important” dropped off severely. In other words, the other characteristics weren’t as important.

For example, only 14.3% of distributors thought Brand was very important. Even fewer ranked Online Services as “very important.” These two factors were seen as “somewhat important.” About 2% of those who responded to this survey had Other as a factor and wrote in the following (among other factors):

• Price
• Quality/Reliability
• Approved by Utility
• Customer Request
• Engineering Specification
• Packaging

Delivery and Availability, however, were by far the factors distributors considered “very important.” In other words, if you have it and can deliver it, you’re in business! What else does this tell marketers at manufacturers and distributor companies?

First, companies in different product categories  rank these factors differently — but not that differently! For example, Accountability sent distributors surveys regarding Lighting Products and Tools. While it cannot be denied that Availability and Delivery are still the key factors across these subsets, Brand ranks higher for distributors responding to the Tools survey compared to those who participated in the Lighting Products survey. Technical Support, on the other hand, ranks higher for distributors who took the Lighting survey. This means that individually, the specific product or service may actually “adjust” these factors in a distributor’s mind. Or in other words, the “hot buttons” might change.

It almost seems like common sense, doesn’t it? Having something to sell, then delivering it to someone who wants it…how difficult is that? But your hot buttons may not be your customer’s. You are the manufacturer’s customer, but how do your customers perceive you in terms of these factors?

In a different survey of contractors, we found that Availability grew 12 percentage points between the years 2003 to 2007. In other words, Availability became more important between the time we conducted this survey. On-site Delivery also grew 12 percentage points. Only Brands Carried grew more, indicating that contractors wanted more choices from the distributors. But the bottom line was: Availability and Delivery were the hot buttons contractors were looking for.

Accountability’s research revealed the difference in factors between 2003 and 2007, ranked in order of importance, highest to lowest.

Factor % +/- between 2003 and 2007
Availability of Inventory 12%
Customer Service 8%
Best Price 5%
On-Site Delivery 12%
Responsiveness to Bids 5%
Brands Carried 15%
Variety of Styles 4%
Showroom 8%
Extended Payment Terms 5%
Wholesaler Website -3%
Online Order Entry -2%

So what are your hot buttons? Do you have what your customers want when they want it? Do you provide the response they need and technical assistance?

Please e-mail us with your questions or comments at: mail@a-i-m.com.


Handle E-Mail Lists with Care

August 20, 2009

The low cost and relative ease of sending e-mail to hundreds or even thousands of people at a time have popularized this communications medium for all kinds of messages. But e-mail address lists are prone to abuse, and you should think twice before using entrusted addresses in any way that could compromise your organization’s relationship with the recipients.

As profitable as it may be to share e-mail addresses with other departments in your organization or to market your list to outside parties, the more you e-mail people, the wearier they become about receiving e-mails. Unsolicited or unwanted e-mails give rise to spam complaints, and high rates of spam complaints against your company may prompt your Internet service provider to cut off your service – or you may face more serious consequences under federal anti-spam legislation.

Worse yet, customers who think you have “sold” them out will lose trust in your organization.

A few recommendations:

Continuously update your list of e-mail addresses and other contact information. Lists atrophy quickly, and if you don’t keep up with updates, your lists will become useless
• When renting e-mail address files, work with a reputable list broker who can demonstrate that the addresses come from permissible sources.
Be careful about sharing files with other groups or departments in your organization. An addressee who opts out of receiving e-mails from one group likely expects to be dropped from all corporate e-mail communications. It may be tricky, however, to find and purge the name if it resides on multiple lists or databases.
Protect e-mail address files by conducting e-mail campaigns in-house or with a trustworthy partner.

For an example of a marketing program for a major plumbing manufacturer that is promoted largely through e-mail campaigns, visit: http://www.interlinegroup.com/our-work-case-studies.php?studyid=7


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.